Follow the adventures of Timmy and his tutor Ms. Rita! Learning is fun! « Arts In Education Week :: Why Teach the Arts? | Part 2 »

Why Teach the Arts? | Part 3

Aug 15 | Why Teach the Arts? | Part 3

by Chloé Langley

Is studying the arts in school valuable only for those wishing to become artists? Pablo Picasso answered this question when he said, "Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist when he grows up." As Dissanayake pointed out art is a crucial part of what makes us human. We are all born with an artistic soul. Watch a four year old "dancing" to music only she hears or coloring a huge mural with only two shades of pink. Artistry is everywhere and so accessible. Children have the capacity to see beauty in the simplest things. A child will observe the sun and draw every picture for weeks with a huge yellow blob gracing the sky. They draw the same pictures over and over again just to illustrate the small differences. Children dance and dance, not needing to turn or to leap to impress their peers but just to move to express their joy. It is beautiful! But by not teaching the arts, we are allowing our cookie cutter, technological society to educate out this innate, fearless creativity.

Follow up:

 We are becoming a society of people who blindly do what has been done and what is accepted. Support for this idea comes from an unlikely group. An IBM study of 1,500 CEOs identified creativity as the most important personal characteristic for future business leaders in a world of increasing global complexities (Kern). They have declared that "success requires fresh thinking and continuous innovation" (Kern). It is their belief that creativity that will allow a new generation of business leaders to operate with more dexterity, to disrupt the status quo and existing business models, and most importantly to drive decision making by disrupting what they call "organizational paralysis" (Kern). Creativity may be an inherent aspect of Homo Aestheticus, but as with all things, that which is not used will atrophy. If we do not teach the arts, the capacity for creative thinking will die and there will soon be no one capable of breaking the mold. If we allow education in the arts to die, all that is great about our society will die as well. Without ideas we cannot advance.

As an artist I want to argue for teaching the arts in the schools and, like Eisner, I want to insist that the arts not be diminished during the integration process. There is a grace and beauty in art that has value just because it is. At the same time the arts provide a way to vary the purpose of academic thinking by finding different forms of inspiration. I would never suggest that an art class should take the place of studying calculus. The arts, no matter how brilliantly integrated in our schools will never help a child learn to spell supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. But an art class can teach a child to imagine the possibilities of the word. Once we stop trying to make the arts "made to order," we will begin to learn how to truly use them to benefit our children's futures. If we leave arts standards as they are, unfinished and undefined, they will continue to be a distraction instead of a springboard to a brighter future. The arts are an all encompassing field that assists in areas we can't quantify completely. If proof is needed for these programs to grow, then it is imperative that studies be designed to provide the proof that analytical thinkers require.

Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3

About The Author

Chloé is entering her senior year at The University of Utah where she is majoring in Modern Dance. She began dancing at the age of four and received most of her early training at Amanda's Dance in Grand Prairie, Texas. In addition to this studio training, Chloé attended the Dallas Independent School System's wonderful arts program where she graduated from Booker T. Washington High School for the Performing and Visual Arts. The concept for this paper grew out of her personal observation that despite the long hours devoted to the study of their respective crafts, her peers both in the studio and at school seemed as a whole to excel academically.

Works Cited

D'Agrosa, Esther. "Making Music, Reaching Readers." General Music Today 21.2 (2008): 6-10. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 19 July 2010.

Dickinson, Dee. "Learning Through the Arts." New Horizons for Learning. Web. 18 July 2010. < http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/arts/dickinson_lrnarts.htm>.

Dissanayake, Ellen. Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes From and Why. New York: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc., 1992.

Eisner, E.W. "The Misunderstood Role of the Arts in Human Development." Phi Delta Kappan 73.8 (1992): 591. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 17 July 2010.

Eisner, Elliott W. "Does Experience in the Arts Boost Academic Achievement?." Clearing House 72.3 (1999): 143. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 17 July 2010.

"Ellen Dissanayake". 13 August 2010 <http://ellendissanayake.com>.

Fowler, Charles. Strong Arts, Strong Schools: The Promising Potential and Shortsighted Disregard of the Arts in American Schooling. New York. Oxford University Press, Inc. 1996.

Goldblatt, Patricia. "How John Dewey's Theories Underpin Art and Art Education." Education and Culture 22.1 (2006) 17-34. Project Muse. 31 July 2010. < http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/education_and_culture/v022/22.1goldblatt.html>.

Greene, Maxine. "Breaking Through The Ordinary: The Arts And Future Possibility." Journal of Education 162.3 (1980): 18. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 26 July 2010.

Gullatt, David E. "Enhancing Student Learning Through Arts Integration: Implications for the Profession." High School Journal 91.4 (2008): 12-25. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 14 July 2010.

"Harvard Educational Review". 13 August 2010 http://www.hepg.org/her/booknote/61.

Hetland, Lois, and Ellen Winner. "The Arts and Academic Achievement: What the Evidence Shows." Arts Education Policy Review 102.5 (2001): 3. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 20 July 2010.

Kern, Frank. "What Chief Executives Really Want." Bloomberg Businessweek. 18 May 2010. Web. 20 July 2010. < http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/may2010/id20100517_190221.htm>.

Upitis, Rena. "What is Arts Education Good For?." Education Canada 43.4 (2003): 24-27. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 21 July 2010.

Categories: Educational Activism, Arts in Education | PermalinkPermalink | 2 feedbacks »

Comments:

Comment from: Sue Waite-Langley [Member]
11/22/10 @ 17:28
Another article dealing with the importance of an arts education. What do the arts bring to education?
Comment from: Sue Waite-Langley [Member]
12/07/10 @ 15:39
Here's another and very valid point of view on why the arts should be a strong component of every child's education. Importance of arts and music in the high school curriculum

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.

Jan Van Blarcum | Founder | Successfully completed Creative Tutors' Advanced Training Program.

Meet Jan Van Blarcum | Founder

In 1999, Jan Van Blarcum, Ph.D. founded Creative Tutors. As an educator, Dr. Van Blarcum understood the importance of personalized attention in a child's educational growth. Her passion for learning grew into a business endeavor that provides customized, one-on-one, in-home tutoring to children with a variety of learning needs. Every child receives personalized attention from certified/degreed educators. Jan has acquired invaluable experience through living abroad, teaching in many educational environments and has acquired business development experience. These unique experiences, coupled with her fervent desire to provide all children with the tools needed to achieve their potential in today's educational environment, led her to establish Creative Tutors and their sister organization Creative Learning 4 Kids, Inc. a 501(c)(3) company.

"The great thing about learning is that no one can take it away from you." B.B. King